- Intel Celeron Processor 1007u 2m Cache 1.50 Ghz -
- Intel Celeron Processor 1007u 2m Cache 1.50 Ghz Processor
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5200 vs 1007U among all CPUs
인텔® 셀러론® 프로세서 1007u (2m 캐시, 1.50 ghz) 사양, 기능, 가격, 호환성, 디자인 문서, 주문 코드, 사양 코드 등을 포함하는 빠른 참조 안내서. We put the 2.5 GHz Intel E5200 to the test against the 1.5 GHz 1007U to find out which you should buy.
The MP103USB is rack-mountable and designed for professional DJs and installations. Thousands of songs can be loaded from a computer onto a USB flash or hard drive. The MP103USB's USB input allows you to put your entire digital music library on a USB flash or hard drive and perform with it at a gig. NUMARK CANADA 4200 Boul Matte Unit C Brossard, QC J4Y 3J5 Tel: 1 833-466-9165. InMusic GmbH Harkortstr. 0 Ratingen Germany Tel: +49 2102 7402 0 Support: +49 2102 7402 20150. NUMARK ALESIS EUROPE LTD Unit 3, Nexus Park Lysons Avenue Ash Vale Hampshire GU12 5QE United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 1252 896 000. NUMARK TAIPEI 7th Floor, NO. Numark usb turntable software.
Intel Celeron Processor 1007u 2m Cache 1.50 Ghz -
Benchmark performance using all cores |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Individual core benchmark performance |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Intel Celeron Processor 1007u 2m Cache 1.50 Ghz Processor
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Are you paying a premium for performance? |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
CPUBoss Score |
Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
Intel Pentium E5200 |
| ||||
| Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 106,400 MB/s | vs | 78,500 MB/s | More than 35% better geekbench 3 AES single core score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later |
| Significantly higher clock speed | 2.5 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | More than 65% higher clock speed |
| Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | 2,230 | vs | 1,995 | More than 10% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score |
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.78 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | More than 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Air) |
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core |
| Much better performance per dollar | 1.45 pt/$ | vs | 0.99 pt/$ | More than 45% better performance per dollar |
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.9 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | More than 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
| ||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor |
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines |
| Much lower typical power consumption | 13.81W | vs | 52.81W | 3.8x lower typical power consumption |
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 105 °C | vs | 74.1 °C | More than 40% higher Maximum operating temperature |
| Newer | Jan, 2013 | vs | Jul, 2008 | Release date over 4 years later |
| Better performance per watt | 4.38 pt/W | vs | 1.6 pt/W | Around 2.8x better performance per watt |
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | 3.8x lower annual home energy cost |
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 14.89 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | 3.8x lower annual commercial energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E5200 vs Celeron 1007U
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core)Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core)Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core)Data courtesy Primate Labs
summary | Pentium E5200 | vs | Celeron 1007U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
| BGA 1023 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 17W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 4.1 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 14.89 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.6 pt/W | 4.38 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 13.81W |
details | Pentium E5200 | vs | Celeron 1007U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 12 | 15 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 74.1°C | Unknown - 105°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.78 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.9 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.78 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 350 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,000 MHz | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 |
